On assessment system for examining inland ship greenization level and its application

SHI Hui; ZHANG Yan; YUAN Chengqing; DENG Tong

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4653.2024.01.016

Navigation of China > 2024 > 47(1): 131-138. > DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4653.2024.01.016

SHI Hui, ZHANG Yan, YUAN Chengqing, DENG Tong. On assessment system for examining inland ship greenization level and its application[J]. Navigation of China, 2024, 47(1): 131-138. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4653.2024.01.016

Citation:

PDF (1132 KB)

On assessment system for examining inland ship greenization level and its application

SHI Hui^1,2,
ZHANG Yan^1,3,4, ,,
YUAN Chengqing^1,3,
DENG Tong²

1. State Key Laboratory of Maritime Technology and Safety, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China;
2. School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Energy Power Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China;
3. School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China;
4. Guangdong Inland Port and Shipping Industry Research Co., Ltd., Shaoguan 512000, China

More Information

Received Date: October 13, 2022

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

The connotation of green ship is discussed systematically and comprehensively. The development status of green ship technologies is reviewed and the impacts of green technologies on ships in whole lifecycle are summarized. An inland ship greenization level assessment system is developed to improve the rationality, reliability, flexibility and efficiency of the assessment process. The index system measures inland ship's level of green technology application in 3 dimensions: ship itself, effect of used technology, and economy. The evaluation method of each index is devised. An inland hybrid power bulk carrier is examined for illustration. The operation data from the ship is examined by the assessment model. The examination shows that, compared to diesel power, the green technology used can reduce total carbon emissions by 12.3% and cost by 8.9% in whole lifecycle. The Attained EEDI of the ship is 23.5% lower than tier Ⅲ benchmark of EEDI.
- inland navigation,
- green ship,
- evaluation indicators,
- assessment model,
- ship data evaluation

FullText(HTML)

References (14)

References

[1]	卜聃, 柯赟.关于内河航运绿色低碳发展建议[J].中国水运, 2022(3):16-17.BU D, KE Y.Suggestions for green and low carbon development of inland shipping[J].China Water Transport, 2022(3):16-17.(in Chinese)
[2]	李碧英.绿色船舶及其评价指标体系研究[J].中国造船, 2008, 49(S1):27-35.LI B Y.Study on green ship and it's assessment index system[J].Shipbuilding of China, 2008, 49(S1):27-35.(in Chinese)
[3]	于柏枫.浅析绿色船舶的评价体系[J].科技资讯, 2012(4):233.YU B F.Analysis of the evaluation system for green ships[J].Science & Technology Information, 2012(4):233.(in Chinese)
[4]	王瑞昌, 陈志华, 明新国.船舶动力系统全生命周期绿色设计的评价方法[J].上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(3):256-264.WANG R C, CHEN Z H, MING X G.Life cycle assessment of marine power system's green design[J].Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2020, 54(3):256-264.(in Chinese)
[5]	DELIGIANNIS P.Ship performance indicator[J].Marine Policy, 2017, 75:204-209.
[6]	中国船级社.内河绿色船舶规范(2020)[S].北京:人民交通出版社, 2020.China Classification Society.Regulations for green ships on inland rivers(2020)[S] Beijing:China Communications Press, 2020.(in Chinese)
[7]	喻露, 王志芳, 肖曙明, 等.内河绿色船舶综合定量评价体系[J].中国航海, 2021, 44(1):126-131.YU L, WANG Z F, XIAO S M, et al.An improved quantitative comprehensive evaluation system for inland green ship classification[J].Navigation of China, 2021, 44(1):126-131.(in Chinese)
[8]	赵正平.浅议绿色造船技术体系[J].中国造船, 2008, 49(S1):36-40.ZHAO Z P.Discussion on green shipbuilding technology system[J].Shipbuilding of China, 2008, 49(S1):36-40.(in Chinese)
[9]	李晓冬, 唐文勇.基于灰色关联度的船舶风险控制方案多指标评价模型[J].中国造船, 2015, 56(2):193-200.LI X D, TANG W Y.A multiple attribute decision-making model of ship risk control options based on gray correlation[J].Shipbuilding of China, 2015, 56(2):193-200.(in Chinese)
[10]	PARKER S, RAUCCI C, SMITH T, et al.Understanding the energy efficiency operational indicator:an empirical analysis of ships from the Royal Belgian[R].London:UCL Energy Institute, Royal Belgian Shipowners' Association, 2015.
[11]	任静, 胡晓轩, 杨山林, 等.船舶制造技术成熟度评估系统[J].造船技术, 2021, 49(5):71-76.REN J, HU X X, YANG S L, et al.Ship manufacturing technology maturity evaluation system[J].Marine Technology, 2021, 49(5):71-76.(in Chinese)
[12]	KRETSCHMANN L, BURMEISTER H C, JAHN C.Analyzing the economic benefit of unmanned autonomous ships:an exploratory cost-comparison between an autonomous and a conventional bulk carrier[J].Research in Transportation Business and Management, 2017, 25:76-86.
[13]	姜哲伦.基于全生命周期理念船舶经济性评价系统研究[D].大连:大连理工大学, 2018.JIANG Z L.Study of ship economic evaluation system based on life cycle concept[D].Dalian:Dalian University of Technology, 2018.(in Chinese)
[14]	张泉乐.运输船舶营运经济性分析与研究[D].武汉:武汉理工大学, 2004.ZHANG Q L.Research on the operation economy of ship transportation[D].Wuhan:Wuhan University of Technology, 2004.(in Chinese)

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (23) PDF downloads (8)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

On assessment system for examining inland ship greenization level and its application

Abstract

References

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content